Reach COD with disciplined test readiness not last-minute firefighting. Protocols, evidence trails, and performance validation that reduce disputes and carry cleanly into warranty and operations.
Most schedule slips and post-COD surprises come from weak commissioning controls: incomplete pre-reqs, unclear test ownership, inconsistent SCADA signals, and punch lists that don’t close. MetRenew structures commissioning as a governed pathway pre-commissioning readiness, test protocols, interface validation, and evidence capture aligned to contractual acceptance criteria. The outcome is faster COD, fewer re-tests, cleaner documentation, and a smoother handover into operations, warranties, and claims management.
We work backward from contractual acceptance to define test sequence, prerequisites, responsibilities, and sign-off gates. This prevents “test-day surprises,” protects the critical path, and aligns EPC, OEMs, grid interface, and O&M readiness around a single commissioning plan.
We establish readiness gates for mechanical completion, QA/QC dossiers, as-built verification, spares and tooling, and interface sign-offs (substation, protection, PPC, SCADA). The goal is fewer stoppages during energization and fewer rework loops during functional testing.
We validate signals end-to-end (field → SCADA/historian → alarms → reporting) and verify control behavior (setpoints, ramping, curtailment response, reactive capability). This reduces false alarms, missing telemetry, and control instability that can block grid synchronization and acceptance.
We structure protocols for PR / energy yield validation (as applicable), capacity and availability evidence, and BESS performance checks where relevant. Evidence trails are designed to align with contract terms so results are defensible and disputes are minimized.
We run closure governance: punch list prioritization, defect categorization, retest triggers, and final handover packs. This creates an operations-ready baseline critical for warranty enforcement, SLA tracking, and claims evidence from day one.
Multiple contractors arrive at energization with open prerequisites. Outcome: a single readiness dashboard, gated sign-offs, and a test sequence that protects the critical path and reduces re-tests.
Telemetry gaps and unstable plant behavior trigger repeated failures. Outcome: end-to-end signal validation and controls verification so synchronization, curtailment response, and alarms meet acceptance criteria.
Systems interact but responsibilities are unclear. Outcome: interface closure and coordinated functional testing across inverter/BESS/PPC/EMS to prevent integration failures and acceptance delays.
Results are questioned due to weak evidence. Outcome: contractual alignment of protocols and defensible evidence packs that reduce disputes and support clean handover into warranty periods.
We design commissioning as a governed pathway with prerequisites, ownership, and decision gates so testing is predictable, not improvised.
Test results are only valuable when defensible. We prioritize traceable documentation, repeatable protocols, and clean sign-offs aligned to acceptance clauses.
Commissioning outputs are structured to support warranty enforcement, SLA tracking, and claims readiness so issues become recoveries and fixes, not revenue leakage.
Turn COD into a controlled pathway without re-tests and disputes
A governed pathway from readiness to acceptance: prerequisites, test sequencing, functional validation, controls/SCADA verification, performance validation, punch-list closure, and documentation packs aligned to COD and contractual acceptance.
By enforcing readiness gates, closing interfaces early, aligning responsibilities, and using repeatable protocols so issues are found before energization, not during it.
Yes. We structure test governance across solar, BESS, and hybrid configurations, with focused attention on controls, telemetry, safety requirements, and interface responsibility.
Open prerequisites, interface gaps, SCADA signal inconsistencies, unclear test ownership, and punch lists that don’t close leading to repeated stoppages and delays.
Yes. We align protocols and evidence capture to acceptance clauses so results are defensible and disputes are reduced.
It ensures field signals, alarms, reporting, and controls behave correctly end-to-end critical for acceptance, stable operation, and reliable performance tracking.
Closed punch lists, complete documentation, validated baseline performance evidence, and warranty-ready data so operations can run and recoveries can be enforced from day one.
Early during engineering and procurement so interfaces, telemetry, and test readiness are designed in, not “patched” during site execution.
Let’s Connect
Whether you’re evaluating a new project, strengthening feasibility, preparing for EPC execution, or building ESG readiness, we’ll help you clarify the next steps and structure the path forward with measurable delivery milestones.
Insights and analysis from across renewable energy technologies, digital transformation, ESG, policy, and project finance.
Dive into the future with MetRenew: Subscribe for updates on renewable energy, career opportunities, and sustainability breakthroughs.